LAW OFFICES OF GEOFFREY D. MUELLER, LLC

366 Kinderkamack Road
Westwood, New Jersey 07675
610 East Palisade Avenue
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632
2 William Street - Suite 509
White Plains, New York 10601
Phone: (201) 569-2533 Fax: (201) 569-2554

Dear Clients & Friends-

Given the rapidly evolving Covid-19 scenarios, it is important to us for you to know we are closely following the recommendations of the CDC, WHO, State of New Jersey, State of New York and other healthcare entities to minimize the risk of transmission and protect the health, safety and well-being of our employees, clients and visitors.

This is a priority to us.

An equal and concurrent priority is our ability to continue to successfully address your legal and business matters. If and when it becomes necessary to work remotely, we are immediately prepared to seamlessly serve you with the same vigor and effectiveness we have always demonstrated.

Regardless of how current events unfold, we are and will continue to be completely and immediately available to you, whether by phone, email or otherwise, exemplifying the type of prompt, zealous and courteous representation you should expect from all legal counsel.

As always, if we can assist you in any way, please let me know directly.

Stay safe and be well.

Geoffrey D. Mueller

GEOFFREY D. MUELLER

District Court of New Jersey Requires Production of Surveillance Video Prior to Plaintiff's Deposition - Gardner v. Norfolk Southern Corporation

Per the NJ Law Journal:

"A defendant in a personal injury case must turn over surveillance video to plaintiffs prior to deposing them, despite the objection that disclosure would defeat the footage's impeachment value.

"U.S. Magistrate Judge Ann Marie Donio's April 17 ruling, denying a protective order to Conrail, appears to be one of first impression in the District of New Jersey.

"Because the surveillance materials directly relate to the plaintiffs' physical condition, they have a substantive value in the case that goes beyond using them for impeachment and thus, permitting the delay sought by the defense 'would nullify the discovery process,' Donio wrote in Gardner v. Norfolk Southern Corporation.

"'Fairness concerns weigh against the kind of sandbagging involved when the moving party sets up grounds for impeachment by using undisclosed materials in an attempt to manufacture inconsistencies.'"

Full article after the jump...