NY Times - Final Word on U.S. Law Isn’t: Supreme Court Keeps Editing
Tuesday, May 27, 2014
Final Word on U.S. Law Isn’t: Supreme Court Keeps Editing http://t.co/E3zknyeJkc
— Geoffrey D. Mueller (@GDM_Law) May 27, 2014- Appellate Division Effectively Eviscerates Default Judgments Against Pro Se Litigants - The Ridge at Back Brook v. Klenert
- According To The Dictionary, “Literally” Now Also Means “Figuratively”
- Appellate Division Finds Warrantless Blood Draw Not Per Se Unconstitutional - State v. Jones
- The Continued Criminalization of Parenthood
- Wal-Mart and TicketMaster Not Liable for Nosebleed Beach Boys Tickets - Mierzwa v. Wal-Mart & TicketMaster
- N.J. Divorce Litigants May Not Offer Testimony Through Power of Attorney - Marsico v. Marsico
- Colorado Significantly Relaxes Requirements For Retail Marijuana Licensure
- David Mamet Demand Forces Alchemist Theater To Cancel Production Of Oleanna
- Veteran's Benefits Not "Income" for Medicaid Purposes - Galetta v. Velez, 13-532 (D.N.J.)
- U.S. Supreme Court Invalidates Florida IQ Cutoff for Capital Punishment - Hall v. Florida
- NY Times - Final Word on U.S. Law Isn’t: Supreme Court Keeps Editing
- No Redaction of OPRA Documents for Irrelevance - ACLU v. NJ Division of Criminal Justice (A-3381-12T1)